Classical Convergence Scenarios quantum- gravity in New Physical model Gravity scheme
This is the free photo or picture example named Classical Convergence Scenarios quantum- gravity in New Physical model Gravity scheme for OffiDocs app Gimp, which can be considered as an online image editor or an online photo studio.
TAGS:
Download or edit the free picture Classical Convergence Scenarios quantum- gravity in New Physical model Gravity scheme for GIMP online editor. It is an image that is valid for other graphic or photo editors in OffiDocs such as Inkscape online and OpenOffice Draw online or LibreOffice online by OffiDocs.
Here we see the classical Gravitational Phi scenarios are placed on the wheel of Entaxia.
The model Phi is the mass x lambda product.
Assumptions, (which have local system resonance)
lambda = 10^11,
G = 1/lambda = 10^-11
[Y] System 'Gamma' = lambda^2 , & = classical [F] & = {t},
all are equivalent in system scaled scenarios.
Del = d/dx in 1-d equivalence with Newtonian [G] = system [k] = [1/lambda]
= Curvature of the system = [10^-11]
Del [Phi] = mass x lambda x [k] = System [ mass x length x system curvature] = mass [m]
locally Del Phi = G. [Mm][lambda] = [Mm] = Binary Mass [M*] = [10^33.10^22] = 10^55
-ve Del[Phi] = -ve[M*] = - [Mm]
where -ve mass = acceleration 'gravity' G{mu-nu} = g[mu-nu]= g{0,1} approx
locally this is [k-dot] = rate of Curvature
= [G-dot] = [G/Y] or G / {'gamma'}
= G/[lambda^2]
= [G/t] = dG/dt = [10^-11] / [10^22] = 10^-33
a = g = [h] Planck
The overarching model identity is a 2nd order eqn in curvature-rate
[k-dot]^2 = [ k. k-dd] h^2 = G . [d^2 G/dt^2] = G. dh/dt
We can see the Einstein field eqns here as [k-dot]^2 is a [4 x 4] matrix with 6 redundant? terms leavin [16-6] = 10 field eqns.
in effect k-dot = -ve mass,
so [k-dot]^2 = {16} x {a]^2 = Omega,
[w] = a.a = -ve m. -vem & -ve.-ve m .m
or [g]^2 and/or mS-dot as S-dot = -ve a = -ve.-ve mass
so we have entropy and gravity as emergence phenomenon.
Note the B- 'field' is equivalent to 'model' entropy [S], both are coincident at [k^9] c.w. peg
or they are one & the same phenomenon, which has large magnitude in atoomic scale systems, and low mag in Macro scales.
In the attachment we also see Maxwell's E = k^10 = -ve frequency which is convergent in c.w. phase rotation to the lambda^6 peg = [m.lambda] = Phi
The [previous over-arching identity can devolve down
through integration over system t = Y
Thus a 2nd order eqn
[k-dot] = Y .k-dd whence we can derive the Einstein & Newton eqns of motion/ + U.l.G. & F= ma,
= [m.k]-dot = m-dot . k (+) m .k-dot,
thus Superosition states etc,etc
We note here in the Physical model -ve F = -ve gamma = system omega
-ve.-ve F = -ve w = K^2 = Hooke Constant squared at c.w. peg k^14, and coincident with a.c.w. gamma peg at lambda^2, etc.
One further gamma integral gives
k = Y.k-dot
or, G = Y.h
thus local system gamma yields 'quantum-gravity'
where, curavature 'rate' equals Planck [h] magnitude, 7 is gained from Newtonian curvature parameter [G]
Y = G/h
It doesen't get much better than this.
-ve mass as the gravity pixel [h] is coincident with Dirac's -ve mass I suspect? &
it can be seen that Model Phi [M.lambda] rests on the gamma cubed peg.
From this we can derive several other classical paradigms from Kepler to Dirac, with Schrodinger Heisenberg, De Broglie, etc, left as an exercise for the reader,
... don't despair it took me 7 yrs. A good start is the model identity & gamma variant.
[m . m-dot] = -1 = [w]-dot
The hot debate between Einstein & Bohr has resolution also.
The continuum is found as there are myriad binary systems out there, making their own gravity pixel/s it just so happens ours rests at [h], which thus is a quantized system,...among many we can presume.
It is possible perhaps that the local pixel [h] on Mars & Jupiter would be lesser respectively to 'Terra Firma' case, all in all a confirmation of the Copernican principle.
A lesser unit can be found if we fashion a quantum well or box where the infinite side walls represent a closed system. Our local inserted binary scheme fashions an eigenvalue unit approx 10^-55 from the Bohr energy levels eqn setting (n=1).
This I propose is our local measure of a dispersion relationship covering the proto-Atomik scheme. {n>1} may allow a Mendeelevian expansion to cover & tabulate others. This represents a Mach principle at work in balance & self regulating schemes, & thus Macro properties out there, govern micro scales locally, in this model we call this phenomenon Enanthiomorphik schema.
On a temporal note & the model gamma = force & time & Area, etc, we see in balanced schemes thro N.3.L perhaps, that gamma will have its -ve coiinterpoint, in omega,
or [-veY = w] & therefore a balanced system with zero net F allows for 0 net time, or in laymans terms 'time flows both ways at once' and a null result follows or time does not exist as paradigm with time is eternal, \tS-state arguments etc.
The Galactic rotation conundrum can be viewed as V large systems have v low [k] and thus v.v. low gravity. We need to use local system curvature [k] of course not [G] & we won't get [h] either. Thus a strong statement from this model is " there are no Universal constants in Nature,...only local system numbers.
Dark energy & mass are found from entropy considerations & simply.
Entriopy [S] = w.a = k^9
= -ve [k] locally -ve [G] = [k^8].k = [G^9] = 10^-99
Entropy rate [S]-dot = [S/Y] = k^11 = 10^-121
=Einstein's C.C. = LAMBDA dark 'energy'?
where S-dot = -ve a = -ve.-ve mass
Rate of entropy rate = [S/Y^2] = [S/p] = pi.[S] = k^13 = dark mass? perhaps
= -ve [1/m] = -ve.-ve energy
Conventional Commutators [x p] when explored with the physical model can yield +VE & -VE MASS or (gravity) plus -ve.-ve mass = -ve gravity ie entropy rate = dS/dt as nested or emergent phemomena\ud83d\ude06.
Finally a convergence scenario invoking model 2nd order Psi identity as equivalence with classical a.h.m.lore where conventional -vew^2 x = d^2 x / dt^2 can replace -ve unity with w-dot = dw/dt = 1/Y^3 . 1/ (Y) = [wf] = -ve operator, and by derivation -ve [w^2] = k^8.k^12 = (k^16). (PI)
thus model equivalence s.h.m. x-dd = [pi].x of course [x]= Psi is quite general can be m, lambda, energy, etc etc.
Also a final look at convergence of Schrodinger's San with N.2.I as applied to our local binary suggesting local Psi = G plus an additional -ve energy suggestion to complete a gravity Schlesinger with model nuance.
This has been modelled as a closed system, & there are many systems out there aside from our best of all possibly done tuned scenario.
It's a Beautiful day...don't let it get a way.
\ud83d\ude06
Sin e an sceal.
Christoir.
-
Free picture Classical Convergence Scenarios quantum- gravity in New Physical model Gravity scheme integrated with the OffiDocs web apps